crista Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 her best VSFSH were in 2005, and 2006 i loved here body then .when she was only working out like normal models do..i think she don't need that ''too much'' boxing couse her body is becoming like doutzen's one very very masculine :yuckky: i hate it i mean just take a look at the new photoshoot of V magazine''april 2012 sports'' <_< and i don't understand why her face is looking very tired recently i noticed it from the vs valentines day 2012 event maybe couse she is getting older or ... i don't know I agree. They are like a bodybuilder ... Awful photoshoot :x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Souled-Out Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 I liked adriana's body around that, I think the pose made it awkward Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherrybomb Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 For me her best vsfs bodies were in 2003 and 2005. I happen to love the V man editorial. I think Adriana's body /stomach can sometimes look "muscular" or "manly" just like doutzens. But the V Man editorial was all about fashion, opposed to sexy like VS. I like the emphasis on the theme rather than concentrating on the fact that her body doesn't look as feminine. To me it just makes sense, given that it was the sports issue...I'm happy they weren't focused on looking like supermodels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crista Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 For me her best vsfs bodies were in 2003 and 2005. I happen to love the V man editorial. I think Adriana's body /stomach can sometimes look "muscular" or "manly" just like doutzens. But the V Man editorial was all about fashion, opposed to sexy like VS. I like the emphasis on the theme rather than concentrating on the fact that her body doesn't look as feminine. To me it just makes sense, given that it was the sports issue...I'm happy they weren't focused on looking like supermodels.Yes, I partially agree with you, but if it's the opposite of sexuality, then why do all this weary face, with this languid look and mouth open, the same that it was absolutely everywhere it shows. Why not just relax at least once this face, when the same photo shoot that requires it ... I believe that such expression is not completely combined with the body in THIS photoshoot.This is my point of view, and I think everything could turn out differently .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherrybomb Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 For me her best vsfs bodies were in 2003 and 2005. I happen to love the V man editorial. I think Adriana's body /stomach can sometimes look "muscular" or "manly" just like doutzens. But the V Man editorial was all about fashion, opposed to sexy like VS. I like the emphasis on the theme rather than concentrating on the fact that her body doesn't look as feminine. To me it just makes sense, given that it was the sports issue...I'm happy they weren't focused on looking like supermodels.Yes, I partially agree with you, but if it's the opposite of sexuality, then why do all this weary face, with this languid look and mouth open, the same that it was absolutely everywhere it shows. Why not just relax at least once this face, when the same photo shoot that requires it ... I believe that such expression is not completely combined with the body in THIS photoshoot.This is my point of view, and I think everything could turn out differently ....I didn't say it had to be the opposite of sexuality, I just said it wasn't just what VS is...which is being sexy and appealing in lingerie. Fashion is about all sorts of things. And their faces are naturally exotic and gorgeous, it doesn't have to be black or white... I don't think they went out of their way to make sexy faces. The faces actually fit the editorial, they can't just box or "attack" each other for the photoshoot and forget the fact that they are models and still have to control their faces. To me it doesn't come off like they're trying to be sexier than they just are... I don't think the photoshoot would work as well if their bodies were angelic and goddesslike..what would be the point of attacking each other? if nothing about them screamed "warrior" or "fighter"? It would be more like a porno/men's magazine shoot with two girls on top of one another rather than a fashion editorial. But that's just my take on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Souled-Out Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 I think they did those faces to look FIERCE lol, in which they did lol. I mean these were the photos that got chosen for the magazine...so I guess that means mission accomplished as far as the look for the photoshoot goes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crista Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 For me her best vsfs bodies were in 2003 and 2005. I happen to love the V man editorial. I think Adriana's body /stomach can sometimes look "muscular" or "manly" just like doutzens. But the V Man editorial was all about fashion, opposed to sexy like VS. I like the emphasis on the theme rather than concentrating on the fact that her body doesn't look as feminine. To me it just makes sense, given that it was the sports issue...I'm happy they weren't focused on looking like supermodels. Yes, I partially agree with you, but if it's the opposite of sexuality, then why do all this weary face, with this languid look and mouth open, the same that it was absolutely everywhere it shows. Why not just relax at least once this face, when the same photo shoot that requires it ... I believe that such expression is not completely combined with the body in THIS photoshoot. This is my point of view, and I think everything could turn out differently .... I didn't say it had to be the opposite of sexuality, I just said it wasn't just what VS is...which is being sexy and appealing in lingerie. Fashion is about all sorts of things. And their faces are naturally exotic and gorgeous, it doesn't have to be black or white... I don't think they went out of their way to make sexy faces. The faces actually fit the editorial, they can't just box or "attack" each other for the photoshoot and forget the fact that they are models and still have to control their faces. To me it doesn't come off like they're trying to be sexier than they just are... I don't think the photoshoot would work as well if their bodies were angelic and goddesslike..what would be the point of attacking each other? if nothing about them screamed "warrior" or "fighter"? It would be more like a porno/men's magazine shoot with two girls on top of one another rather than a fashion editorial. But that's just my take on it. It really is your opinion and I totally respect him. All that I wanted to tell I already have told. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candicelover Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 For me her best vsfs bodies were in 2003 and 2005. I happen to love the V man editorial. I think Adriana's body /stomach can sometimes look "muscular" or "manly" just like doutzens. But the V Man editorial was all about fashion, opposed to sexy like VS. I like the emphasis on the theme rather than concentrating on the fact that her body doesn't look as feminine. To me it just makes sense, given that it was the sports issue...I'm happy they weren't focused on looking like supermodels. well am not talking just about the V magazine it was an example..am just saying that adri's body has changed a lot maybe because she has a daughter now and things have changed but.. even if they weren't focused on looking like supermodel...or if they were focused it's the same thing the body would look exactly the same you know it is always the same body...they probably chose adri and doutzen couse they were addicted to this photoshoot they look muscular and manly p.s Sorry if my english isn't perfect ^^" I'll continue to improve it! am italian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Souled-Out Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 haha tired face even adriana's tired face is great I think at last years swim launch, she was tired but adriana's face is incredible her features are outstanding no matter what. Like that twitpic she posted today, she is the only model who eyes still look as incredible without all the enhancing with heavy eye liner and eye shadow and longer eye lashes. I like candice's body but I don't care for shape. I think toned bodies period are awesome. Candice's face its pretty and its feminine but its almost the exact opposite of adriana's, so I don't care for candice's face type as much as does adriana's. The more makeup you put on adriana's face..can't lie, the worse she looks but the less the better. For candice imo the more makeup she has on the better, the less...She still is beautiful but the prettiness is not as good. And the reaction wouldn't be the same, she just looks better and better with amounts of makeup. Prime example for both of them VSFS 2008. Oh here is adri's tired face: I say this because not only does she look distracted but she hardly cracked a smile and blew kisses the whole event but still looked good, Adriana has spark, a really big one lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Safira Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 her best VSFSH were in 2005, and 2006 i loved here body then .when she was only working out like normal models do..i think she don't need that ''too much'' boxing couse her body is becoming like doutzen's one very very masculine :yuckky: i hate it i mean just take a look at the new photoshoot of V magazine''april 2012 sports'' <_< and i don't understand why her face is looking very tired recently i noticed it from the vs valentines day 2012 event maybe couse she is getting older or ... i don't know Whose face are you talking about?? And I loved adriana's body here I still think you don't get any better than her : yes i really love how she looked in this event dolly face but however i think candice's one is better;) Anyway here are some of the pics of adri's tired face The truth is that in my opinion even when she looks tired she outshines everyone else. Amazing! VSTour Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nazara Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 haha tired face even adriana's tired face is great I think at last years swim launch, she was tired but adriana's face is incredible her features are outstanding no matter what. Like that twitpic she posted today, she is the only model who eyes still look as incredible without all the enhancing with heavy eye liner and eye shadow and longer eye lashes. I like candice's body but I don't care for shape. I think toned bodies period are awesome. Candice's face its pretty and its feminine but its almost the exact opposite of adriana's, so I don't care for candice's face type as much as does adriana's. The more makeup you put on adriana's face..can't lie, the worse she looks but the less the better. For candice imo the more makeup she has on the better, the less...She still is beautiful but the prettiness is not as good. And the reaction wouldn't be the same, she just looks better and better with amounts of makeup. Prime example for both of them VSFS 2008.Oh here is adri's tired face: I say this because not only does she look distracted but she hardly cracked a smile and blew kisses the whole event but still looked good, Adriana has spark, a really big one lol Well, I don't agree with what you said about Candice. (I actually think the opposite.) But I do agree that Adriana looks better with little make-up. However, I also wouldn't say that she doesn't need it at all... In my opinion, she looks best with minimum make-up like in these photos: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candicelover Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 haha tired face even adriana's tired face is great I think at last years swim launch, she was tired but adriana's face is incredible her features are outstanding no matter what. Like that twitpic she posted today, she is the only model who eyes still look as incredible without all the enhancing with heavy eye liner and eye shadow and longer eye lashes. I like candice's body but I don't care for shape. I think toned bodies period are awesome. Candice's face its pretty and its feminine but its almost the exact opposite of adriana's, so I don't care for candice's face type as much as does adriana's. The more makeup you put on adriana's face..can't lie, the worse she looks but the less the better. For candice imo the more makeup she has on the better, the less...She still is beautiful but the prettiness is not as good. And the reaction wouldn't be the same, she just looks better and better with amounts of makeup. Prime example for both of them VSFS 2008.Oh here is adri's tired face: I say this because not only does she look distracted but she hardly cracked a smile and blew kisses the whole event but still looked good, Adriana has spark, a really big one lol ahahah;) i know, you're right when i look at her eyes in different photos is like FALLING IN A GRENADE , i can even immagine my reaction if i see her in the reality you know like you said before candice and adri are two opposite beauty..i did not say that candice face is prettier i was talking about bodies,,,everyone knows that adri's face is the prettest in the world and there are no excuse such an exotic beauty, gosh she is 30 years old and she seems to be 20:) we will see candice too when she will be 30 i guess she will lose a little bit of her sex appeal even her body will change i guess ahah who knows maybe she is going to practice box-.- than will come another girl that will bet candice body too you knoww time changes and the people too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candicelover Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 haha tired face even adriana's tired face is great I think at last years swim launch, she was tired but adriana's face is incredible her features are outstanding no matter what. Like that twitpic she posted today, she is the only model who eyes still look as incredible without all the enhancing with heavy eye liner and eye shadow and longer eye lashes. I like candice's body but I don't care for shape. I think toned bodies period are awesome. Candice's face its pretty and its feminine but its almost the exact opposite of adriana's, so I don't care for candice's face type as much as does adriana's. The more makeup you put on adriana's face..can't lie, the worse she looks but the less the better. For candice imo the more makeup she has on the better, the less...She still is beautiful but the prettiness is not as good. And the reaction wouldn't be the same, she just looks better and better with amounts of makeup. Prime example for both of them VSFS 2008.Oh here is adri's tired face: I say this because not only does she look distracted but she hardly cracked a smile and blew kisses the whole event but still looked good, Adriana has spark, a really big one lol Well, I don't agree with what you said about Candice. (I actually think the opposite.) But I do agree that Adriana looks better with little make-up. However, I also wouldn't say that she doesn't need it at all... In my opinion, she looks best with minimum make-up like in these photos: yes i forgot if ''if someone is beautiful ,it will be beautiful with or without make up i prefer candice only with a little bit of mascara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Souled-Out Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 haha tired face even adriana's tired face is great I think at last years swim launch, she was tired but adriana's face is incredible her features are outstanding no matter what. Like that twitpic she posted today, she is the only model who eyes still look as incredible without all the enhancing with heavy eye liner and eye shadow and longer eye lashes. I like candice's body but I don't care for shape. I think toned bodies period are awesome. Candice's face its pretty and its feminine but its almost the exact opposite of adriana's, so I don't care for candice's face type as much as does adriana's. The more makeup you put on adriana's face..can't lie, the worse she looks but the less the better. For candice imo the more makeup she has on the better, the less...She still is beautiful but the prettiness is not as good. And the reaction wouldn't be the same, she just looks better and better with amounts of makeup. Prime example for both of them VSFS 2008.Oh here is adri's tired face: I say this because not only does she look distracted but she hardly cracked a smile and blew kisses the whole event but still looked good, Adriana has spark, a really big one lol Well, I don't agree with what you said about Candice. (I actually think the opposite.) But I do agree that Adriana looks better with little make-up. However, I also wouldn't say that she doesn't need it at all... In my opinion, she looks best with minimum make-up like in these photos: Adriana non at all, still looks great to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gisellebach Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 She got an incredible body in 2008 too, but no one like those from 2003-2005. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nazara Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Adriana non at all, still looks great to me She did wear minimum make-up in these photos, too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Souled-Out Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Adriana non at all, still looks great to me She did wear minimum make-up in these photos, too Where? I see her freckles, no lip makeup, I don't think she used eye liner because you can see her eyberows aren't as full in the second pic. I think the second pic is all her. Welp she doesn't have makeup on her best features: eyes, lips, eye brows Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nazara Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Adriana non at all, still looks great to me She did wear minimum make-up in these photos, too Where? I see her freckles, no lip makeup, I don't think she used eye liner because you can see her eyberows aren't as full in the second pic. I think the second pic is all her. Welp she doesn't have makeup on her best features: eyes, lips, eye brows On the eyes. Mascara and little eyeshadow. I would also say little lipstick. It's more noticeable here: Don't forget, it's minimum make-up. But you can see it, it's pretty obvious to me, especially in the first photo. However, I think she did not wear make-up in this photo: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candicelover Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Adriana non at all, still looks great to me She did wear minimum make-up in these photos, too Where? I see her freckles, no lip makeup, I don't think she used eye liner because you can see her eyberows aren't as full in the second pic. I think the second pic is all her. Welp she doesn't have makeup on her best features: eyes, lips, eye brows On the eyes. Mascara and little eyeshadow. I would also say little lipstick. It's more noticeable here: Don't forget, it's minimum make-up. But you can see it, it's pretty obvious to me, especially in the first photo. However, I think she did not wear make-up in this photo: HERE TOO! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.