nightlocks Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 +3 (With Cami Morrone & Rachel's boyfriend) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAGGOT Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 I love the dress. Is it my imagination, or does Rachel's face look more filled out/wider? Might be the way she's wearing her hair? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightlocks Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 I think it was the hair and the makeup, to be honest. Also, Rachel shot VS PINK today!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightlocks Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightlocks Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightlocks Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Nicole Miller - Front Row & Backstage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightlocks Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 FEBRUARY 10: 1 OAK 10 ONE OF A KIND YEARS CELEBRATION Source: BARBARA-PALVIN.SOSUGARY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Limerlight Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 I haven't been here in awhile, why does her face look poofy more so than i remember ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshiine Posted February 16, 2017 Share Posted February 16, 2017 out and about New York 14.02.2017 source: celebrityphotos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
preparatory Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 On 12/3/2016 at 6:41 PM, noahshaw said: ^^ Agreed!!! I think she'll make an amazing angel!!! Unfortunately, they won't until she loses weight. Reason why they wouldn't even make her Pink Ambassador, though she deserved it more than Grace (I love Grace, but Rachel has always been one of the best Pink models they've had in recent years.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarahcakes Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 1 minute ago, preparatory said: Unfortunately, they won't until she loses weight. Reason why they wouldn't even make her Pink Ambassador, though she deserved it more than Grace (I love Grace, but Rachel has always been one of the best Pink models they've had in recent years.) ugh really? that sucks! she's gorgeous! her body is amazing, in my opinion. i hate the models can't even have a body. it makes me sad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
preparatory Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 4 minutes ago, sarahcakes said: ugh really? that sucks! she's gorgeous! her body is amazing, in my opinion. i hate the models can't even have a body. it makes me sad. Agreed! They dropped Erin and Barbara for gaining weight. But I remember my manager at VS telling me they would photoshop weight on and off the girls. I always heard Karlie gained weight as an Angel because they were always adding weight to her shoots. They do the same to Stella sometimes, but I think in recent years, they've been going towards a skinnier/high fashion-esq body. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarahcakes Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 Just now, preparatory said: Agreed! They dropped Erin and Barbara for gaining weight. But I remember my manager at VS telling me they would photoshop weight on and off the girls. I always heard Karlie gained weight as an Angel because they were always adding weight to her shoots. They do the same to Stella sometimes, but I think in recent years, they've been going towards a skinnier/high fashion-esq body. i wish they would start appreciating women with real bodies. mine is too big for them. nothing they have fits me. i use their body spray, but i feel judged when i go in there anyway. we shouldn't be aiming to be a person whose bones can be seen. it just makes me really sad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
preparatory Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 2 minutes ago, sarahcakes said: i wish they would start appreciating women with real bodies. mine is too big for them. nothing they have fits me. i use their body spray, but i feel judged when i go in there anyway. we shouldn't be aiming to be a person whose bones can be seen. it just makes me really sad. Oh, the biggest complaint I always got was that they'd get 1 or 2 Large sizes, Pink only goes to 36DD and VSL only goes to 38-40 depending on the bra and size of the store. Like we didn't even carry the Dream Angels Darling Demi style at all. Most the teddies we got one Large. And even online, iirc, they only go up to 42. I was a 34D/36C (I'm 5'7" so pretty average) when I worked there and I would get women all the time even telling me that they were so happy to see "normal size/not skinny" girls in there. Which is insulting, but at the same time, it's like I totally get it. These models are 32B-34C/Ds at most and wearing XS and S. During bra fittings, women would always be like "why doesn't it fit the way it does in the photo" and I'd have to be like the bras in the photos are ill fitted, the bridge/gore isn't sitting properly, the cups are too small, etc. Like, I wish they'd show how a full coverage bra should really fit for it's purpose which is support, not how it should fit just to look sexy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarahcakes Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 1 minute ago, preparatory said: Oh, the biggest complaint I always got was that they'd get 1 or 2 Large sizes, Pink only goes to 36DD and VSL only goes to 38-40 depending on the bra and size of the store. Like we didn't even carry the Dream Angels Darling Demi style at all. Most the teddies we got one Large. And even online, iirc, they only go up to 42. I was a 34D/36C (I'm 5'7" so pretty average) when I worked there and I would get women all the time even telling me that they were so happy to see "normal size/not skinny" girls in there. Which is insulting, but at the same time, it's like I totally get it. These models are 32B-34C/Ds at most and wearing XS and S. During bra fittings, women would always be like "why doesn't it fit the way it does in the photo" and I'd have to be like the bras in the photos are ill fitted, the bridge/gore isn't sitting properly, the cups are too small, etc. Like, I wish they'd show how a full coverage bra should really fit for it's purpose which is support, not how it should fit just to look sexy. i understand that, totally. both getting what they meant and then also being a little insulted. but vs is "sexy". it's not about support, at least not when the models are wearing it. i totally agree with you, though. i wish they'd show a real, good fit. and i'm just sad that rachel isn't skinny enough. actually, i'm kind of disgusted that she's not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
preparatory Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 13 minutes ago, sarahcakes said: i understand that, totally. both getting what they meant and then also being a little insulted. but vs is "sexy". it's not about support, at least not when the models are wearing it. i totally agree with you, though. i wish they'd show a real, good fit. and i'm just sad that rachel isn't skinny enough. actually, i'm kind of disgusted that she's not. Agreed! VS's December sales were down, and I read an article (on Forbes I think?) saying that it could be due to the newest gen buying from all-inclusive, cheaper, online stores. I know it's a huge stretch, but I'm reallllllly hoping that this month they'll announce Rachel as an Angel. But my money would have to go to Gigi or Grace. Rachel would make such a great Angel though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sarahcakes Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 4 minutes ago, preparatory said: Agreed! VS's December sales were down, and I read an article (on Forbes I think?) saying that it could be due to the newest gen buying from all-inclusive, cheaper, online stores. I know it's a huge stretch, but I'm reallllllly hoping that this month they'll announce Rachel as an Angel. But my money would have to go to Gigi or Grace. Rachel would make such a great Angel though. she really would! vs should take note from aerie, though, with their untouched pictures. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanniCullen Posted February 21, 2017 Author Share Posted February 21, 2017 Sooo Rachel is not Pink girl no more? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
preparatory Posted February 21, 2017 Share Posted February 21, 2017 5 hours ago, DanniCullen said: Sooo Rachel is not Pink girl no more? No she is, I had it wrong. I thought Zuri took over for Rachel, then Grace took over for Zuri. But all three are under present contracts as spokesmodels. I didn't realize they were basically like Pink's version of Angels. I thought it was one at a time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightlocks Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 Nick Suarez Ph. for IMG Models Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.