schadenfreude Posted October 22, 2005 Share Posted October 22, 2005 http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/06/09/...age.kid.pundit/http://ruthlessreviews.com/rants/cleanflic...emptyheads.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Posted October 22, 2005 Share Posted October 22, 2005 but what I think one of the biggest threats to our nation is really socialism and degrading government i'm not really a socialist or anything but how is socialism 'one of the biggest threats' to the USA? he disturbs me but if politics 'tickles his pickle' and is essentially his life then it's fine by me . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schadenfreude Posted October 23, 2005 Author Share Posted October 23, 2005 The fact that he is home-schooled is bad enough.People who are home-schooled have parents who want to protect his kids from outside influences. Parents who are as conservative as Amish or Puritans. Afterwards, in his book, he says his political views were not the ramification of him being brainwashed by his parents. Besides that, this kid has strong views against homosexuality. I am still unable to figure out whether homosexuality is right or wrong, and yet this little boy who has yet to grow any pube, preaches that homosexuality is wrong, as if he fully understands the complexity of human sexuality.He also believes strongly that liberals hates America and are trying to destroy it, while I am still unsure about this. There are many, many more reasons for anyone to hate him.If political prosecution is legalized, this little kid will have to be the first victim. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Changa Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 The fact that he is home-schooled is bad enough.People who are home-schooled have parents who want to protect his kids from outside influences. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You obviously don't know many parents who homeschool their children. This is NOT the primary reason the majority of them do it. If you have something against homeschooling, you're stoopid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schadenfreude Posted October 23, 2005 Author Share Posted October 23, 2005 You obviously don't know many parents who homeschool their children. This is NOT the primary reason the majority of them do it. If you have something against homeschooling, you're stoopid. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I think that homeschooling is great, if the parents know what they are doing. Often, it's not the case. Either the parents force-feed the kid with too much data or too little data. I know children with awesome literary skill, but the numeracy skill is appalling. They can write pages of poetry, but can't do basic algebra. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Changa Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 You obviously don't know many parents who homeschool their children. This is NOT the primary reason the majority of them do it. If you have something against homeschooling, you're stoopid. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I think that homeschooling is great, if the parents know what they are doing. Often, it's not the case. Either the parents force-feed the kid with too much data or too little data. I know children with awesome literary skill, but the numeracy skill is appalling. They can write pages of poetry, but can't do basic algebra. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Sounds like you're describing public school to me. I've known (and know) several home-schooled kids and none are like this Kyle Williams (he is unique and admits it) and all of them excel academically and socially. People that bitch about homeschooling are idiots that don't have facts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schadenfreude Posted October 23, 2005 Author Share Posted October 23, 2005 At least you agree that Kyle Williams is a sad, sad little boy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Changa Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 I don't think he is sad at all. I say more power to him! We need someone to step into Rush's shoes when he dies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schadenfreude Posted October 23, 2005 Author Share Posted October 23, 2005 WHo is Rush?This kid is a Michael Moore wannabe, except he sucks much more than Michael Moore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Changa Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 Who is Michael Moore? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schadenfreude Posted October 23, 2005 Author Share Posted October 23, 2005 Who is George Bush? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OriginalSin Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 what's a pokey reese?ahhh the many mysteries of life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red_ed Posted October 23, 2005 Share Posted October 23, 2005 What's with the last 3 posts? Damn you sarcasm (is that what you call it?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schadenfreude Posted October 23, 2005 Author Share Posted October 23, 2005 I don't mean to be sarcastic.But, I really don't know who Rush is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Posted October 24, 2005 Share Posted October 24, 2005 His beliefs according to ruthlessreviews.com :"Homosexuality is evil and disgusting and a "lifestyle choice" Raped women should be forced to have their children FDR was a fascist and a criminal Women who have abortions are more likely to commit suicide or at least be severely depressed Clinton "murdered" the Branch Davidians at Waco Clinton presided over the worst administration in history, one rife with "crime and corruption" The homeless could get jobs but simply refuse to work Abraham Lincoln is unjustly remembered as a hero and the Confederacy is misunderstood Liberals hate America The Supremacy Clause was a "post-Civil War" adoption (Check Article VI, dear Kyle) There is no basis for morality without religion There is no separation between church and state and what's more, there shouldn't be If he owns a small business one day, he doesn't want to be forced to work with gay people Out-of-wedlock births did not exist before liberals started passing out condoms in school Home-schooling is the best alternative for those wanting intelligent, well-rounded children All the Founding Fathers were muscular Christians who wanted God in the public square"he scares me . . . he is rather narrow-minded. how he can say that he hasn't been brainwashed by his parents, i don't know. by the age of 7 he was saying that Clinton was 'sleazy'. how are you gonna know that when you're seven . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Changa Posted October 24, 2005 Share Posted October 24, 2005 He has a few decent points a few to be refined though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Posted October 24, 2005 Share Posted October 24, 2005 i agree with 0 points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OriginalSin Posted October 24, 2005 Share Posted October 24, 2005 i agree with 0 points. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> i think there is something to be said about homeschooling your children, as it doesnt have to be a bad thing. i just dont know if its "the best alternative." everyone is different. certainly its the best alternative for some, not others. and i'm not sure why he thinks women who've been raped should be forced to have their children rather than just abortion should be illegal. thats a little odd to me...so do other non-rape victims get to abort their children, while the raped ones are forced to have them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Changa Posted October 24, 2005 Share Posted October 24, 2005 Sure sounds like that..."forced to" is an interpretation of Kyle's words and it is meant to enflame and create tension. A common tactic on both sides of the fence these days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Posted October 24, 2005 Share Posted October 24, 2005 Sure sounds like that..."forced to" is an interpretation of Kyle's words and it is meant to enflame and create tension. A common tactic on both sides of the fence these days. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> i did get these points from ruthlessreview.com so i assumed that they were harsh criticisms. i just don't like him. his view of the world seems quite blinkered to me. but fair play. he's entitled to his own view even if he is a 'michael moore wannabe' (i really do see that analogy. cheers Heid ). the last one is a blatant warping of his words Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.