LoganJ

A few month ago 500px changed their website with a script to reduce the traffic. After this Update the site checks your max Screen-Resolution and sends smaller images to people with small screens (aprox. 120 %). With the size of 1500 x 844 the screen of wndmkr is probably the size of 1366 x 768. If your screen is larger you get a larger image (if available).

WOW! I love her in this set! This early eighties style fits her perfectly. Many Thanks Neurovibe for your great work here.

You can connect your computer and your TV by HDMI and thus use your TV for testing (as a second Monitor - open the Browser on the TV screen). Bandwidth is the speed and the amount of data the server can send within one second and is divided by the number of active users on the site. Traffic is the amount of data which is sent within a specific time. As the file-size is reduced, the traffic will be reduced and with the same Bandwidth as before, more users can get served at the same time. On the other hand, the short lag of realtime resizing is partly compensated by faster loading (less data) for users with lower screen resolution.

It seems like 500px now checks your screen resolution and sends you an image which is a little larger than your Monitor resolution, resized in realtime. Did anyone check the "new" 500px already with a 4k (3.840 x 2.160 pixels) Monitor or with a virtual Desktop at that size? With my Monitor at 1280 x 1024 I get a max. image resolution of 1500 x 1000 with that "test-image" (I wasn't logged in). Imagus at Opera still works, but as the pages are no more static, it can only provide that 1500 x 1000 pixels. This change can reduce their traffic by approx. 20-30% which should be the reason why they did this change.

If the Photographers would mind about quality, they could do the compression by themselves to meet the specifications of IG and upload images with a much better quality. So, they don't mind, upload their original images and let the compression do by the IG-Servers which use an algorithm that is only oriented on the dimensions and the file-size. If someone is interested in more details about this topic, I can do an extensively explanation about it. But as I don't want to bore the majority of the users here, I'll only write it as an answer to a PM.

The above is the result of "Generation Instagram" where Smartphone-Manufacturers tell their clients that they have a "Camera" built into their Phone. Simply the pure Physics tell every reasonable Person that the quality can't be much better than that of a Pinhole-Camera. Only very complex image-processors can do a little enhancement. But only very expensive Smartphones do have those.

It's called "implied" (Genitalia and Nipples hidden) Nudity

As far as I remember, not within the last few years...

Two more you didn't see... Nudity:

Ouch! Rarely saw such a bad Editotial!

The first, second and third were already posted at 19th of July by Neurovibe but it was in low res. The last one and the topless one in the Archive seems to be new. Ph.: Elena Kunitcyna • Source: Portraitsofgirls.com All the files in original plus one topless: AnastasiyaScheglova_ElenaKunitcyna.rar

Wish you good luck and plenty of HD-space Looks like they have somewhat of a rotation every 4 hours

Today I was lucky and could do a few screen-recordings. Unfortunately I missed a few seconds at the start of the first two clips. Additionally there is at least one more clip of her, which I missed. Here some caps of the clips:

There are exclusive and non-exclusive licenses at some sites. Here it seems to be exclusive, which means that you are the only one who will get a license. After that the clip is "sold out" and no more available. Others sell a certain number of licenses (non-exclusive) which makes it cheaper the more licenses are sold. Those licenses include all costs of producing such a clip (photographing, editing, cutting, location, model-fee and distribution). Seeing it from this angle, the price isn't too high.

Found one from Dmitry Borisov from his 500px Can't remember having seen this one here. Apologies if it's a duplicate seems to be a reworked version of this one