Joe'sCat

Yes & no IMO. She was SO cute in her younger years - unparalleled. She’s still very beautiful, but I lament how she’s conformed to the status quo with enhancements and such. We’re left to wonder how she might look with only natural upkeep - she was into working out and honing her body. For me, a natural “top” has got to be better than patently obvious alterations. Regardless, bluntly her most private areas she’s revealed to an ideally enticing level, and it’s SO “pretty” - again nearly unparalleled. Remember the Revolve catalog era? That one that leaked past the censors was…highly memorable! (Or maybe it was Adore.me ?)

Ladies and gentlemen, place your bets… I’ll start with unspecified number of months, less than a year. A total guess as I’ve not been following her lately.

It hasn't been said/answered (that I've seen): Does she show "down there" in the WTVR magazine? I'm not the first to ask, she even skirted the question on her recent YouTube video responding to her sub/Reddit. IIRC, she essentially said every woman has their own level of comfortability, and she's not opposed to posing in that way . . . but never really answered the question. It's again up above as an asked and "answered" question, but not in that video snippet.

I'm almost always one less. Same 'old same 'ole. She's just barraging the 'net with pics. Now it's just quantity, and so many are just censored now it's just a distraction. Sure, some are really showing work behind the scenes gussing her all up, but most are just crudely masked nipples of tits just a little bit overdone with enhancement now. It seems like a huge marketing blast to "pay $15 monthly to see my nipples". Probably along with some other women. The sign-up site isn't even very detailed on what exactly you can expect to see - all past issues, Etc.? The hair chop job? Meh. She's still pretty, which tells me she not identified by her hair. Kudos to the rest of her body, she's worked out hard to have a body like that (especially her abs/tummy). $15 / month isn't very expensive although it's much higher than other e-zines. But I'd want the full Monty then, not just month after month of pretty much the same regurgitation of overstuffed tits. I'd bet right now if there's a $12 / month as is, and $20 / month and she shows it all, the $20 would swiftly outnumber and sales would leap.

Seems like she's fully embraced topless via WTVR. Might as well! Pay the surgeon back! I see there's masked-for-content elsewhere . . . . I'd pony up $15 for a good look behind that - if it is a good look, and not that "enough to imagine" teases we've seen here and there. Yep, I'm being blunt about it.

Meh to the entire thing, even more. I've before lamented her boob job - sure, it's spectacular and almost size appropriate (too large now). They were nice, now just scream BOOB JOB HERE ----> <---- . Man I wish we could see her topless in natural form . . . . that's forever gone. Her nether lower regions, the very very occasional slight glimpses we've seen . . . I'll bet that pussy is most spectacular. We'll probably never know, that she seems to have on permanent reserve. She's very beautiful, seems to be very fun and I can hardly even imagine her being pissed off or in a bad mood even. But along with that, she's either very flacky, or it's a big act cuz intelligence on a woman is too often seen as a negative. Riding in a car headed somewhere, she doesn't really know where she's going (how many times have we heard her say "I'm not sure" or "I don't know". Big turnoff. Flighty - gonna live in a van (yet still travel the world constantly for modeling/whatever), gonna have a steady boyfriend, gonna . . . . a lot of other things. But, if it's all an act and she's actually wicked witty smart. But if so, it's doomed unless she can toe that ultra-magic line of staying relevant whilst getting older. She already hit her prime, it's largely downhill from here for modeling although she'll almost certainly hold together for years to come. In summary, she's smokin' hot, would be fun to talk to and stuff, but IRL definitely not the girl for me, even if I was anywhere near her league. I can think of countless women I'd rather be with in the big picture. I remember the first pic I saw of her - in a Soma Ad. I didn't know who she was but Wow! what a beauty! I finally found out her name on this forum from some very kind folks in this thread - this forum rocks! Good luck to her.

First for the sake of full disclosure, I haven't yet watched the "Ending my modeling career. What's next?" video. She's been flighty, uncertain (or pretends to be), gonna do this and totally gonna do that coming up . . . including "ending her modeling career". We've seen a video with that subject before. Again to be fair, I'll need to watch this one when I have a bit more time to be certain. Her looks used to be my hands down favorite - like wow, can hardly believe a woman this beautiful exists! She's still so very hot, but inexorably getting more and more "manufactured". And that's fine she can do whatever she wants. It IS fun to see her try out whole new looks and styles. And overall she's "kept it real, down to Earth" and fun to see, watch and listen to. But turn offs for me are the artificial, unsure/ditsy, and ever-wavering commitments. That is, at least two boob jobs (I swear it now looks like a third, it really shows in some pics and overall now they're significantly more pumped up than ever, right to the edge of looking very fake. SO many videos of her going somewhere but not sure where she is, where she's going, or what plan there is if any. Ditsy - a turn off when real, even worse if/when it's fake. I figure I'll take some flack for my comments, it's just my opinion. She's very entertaining to see, but she's slipped down my list steadily lately of women I'd truly want (in fantasy anyway) to actually be closer with than her now.

Indeed. Better to ere on the side of caution and have someone waste a click only to see Rachel Cook's butt, than someone be offended that her butt appeared and they weren't warned and required to take a tiny action first. Sad but out litigious reality now-a-days. It just seems so . . . out of sync with other places in the world, and other topics here and everywhere. So many places don't have such a 😮 attitude towards tasteful, natural nudity. Well, somewhat natural in many cases 🤫. We long ago adopted a rating system for TV, movies Etc., "those magazines" are kept on a different shelf and wrapped in plastic to prevent perusing . . . yet extreme violence is a-okay everywhere - and doesn't even merit an "R" rating unless it's severe enough and usually accompanied by strong language and more. But, you'll always find someone who pretty much seeks it all out, then complains when they find it. Keep in mind, we need "flammable" stickers on lighters . . . Good choice by the site as a whole, and the posters in general when if it isn't absolutely certain, might as well opt for the "Adult Content" flag and minor inconvenience to some, than don't and have a website onslaught because they didn't flag it.

Although much of what I wrote seemingly disagrees with you, I'm not entirely "pegged" in my opinion one way or another! I've been a fan of hers for a while, after seeing her in ads for . . . . Adore.me I think it was. Wow! I was on the hunt, who is this woman?! It was here on this forum I 1st learned of her identity, and it turned out she already had a large and ever-growing fan base. Myself included of course. And resoundingly yes, thanks to all who post and continue to post pics and places she's in, what a handy, vast resource! I'm always lagging behind on all social media platforms and forums, this forum really pulls so much together from all over. I'm very rarely the discoverer and poster of new content. I deeply appreciate those that do participate so much!

She is looking hot lately! And really broadening and experimenting with lots of different looks. Still, I get that she had to have that perfectly proportional body, but the boob job is looking too fake in some pics. They're very well done no doubt, a tad bit bigger than she can really get away with, but it's such a turn-off when it looks so . . . attached onto her, instead of part of her (like in Modellove's upper-middle pic above). Left unsupported and mostly uncovered, it looks very unnatural. Too bad we'll never see how they really would be. Not a total take-away by any means - she's still SO beautiful and cool. Not at all my type though - too carefree, never sure where she's going (or acting like it, which is just ditzy), and not committed to anything for very long other than exercise. Gonna blog all of the time, then none, gonna live in a bus, never really did for long, gonna stay here and do this then suddenly she's across the world instead. I've long ago just conceded that she's committed to nothing. Typical "nice house, nobody home" - literally in her case. I'll still enjoy the view, she's top pretty, but not anywhere near the top of my list of most desirable women overall.

Thanks for sharing those Kane!

Sorry, I'm still bummed about the enlargements. They're getting larger I swear, and totally obvious in this picture. She's got a great body (ass and abs are outstanding), and obviously the results of a lot of dedicated working out. But, the breast looks like blow up doll'ish. Big turn off.

Definitely! She looks quite different in B/W. That same video nude would be the best video ever produced.

Here's one of pics Modelove posted, brightened up for your pleasure / convenience . . . Nudity