neurovibe

Ph.: Gerhard Merzeder • Date: posted April 10 2023 and on • Source: his IG & Nastya's IG • Res.: 1800px

Ph.: n/a • for: EKILOVELY • Date: shot 2021 • Source: their VK, their IG, their site, Nastya's IG • Res.: 2160px (VK), 1800px (IG) and lower

Continuation Ph.: Ekaterina Manoskina • Date: posted July 2 2023 • Source: Nastya's IG • Res.: ~1800px

She used to have way more but her older account had been deleted Ph.: Lubov Subbotina (aka Lyubov) • for: Why not rent • Date: posted May 6 2023 • Source: her IG, their IG • Res.: ~1800px

Ph.: Lukas Dvorak • for: Marley Mag • Date: posted June 2 2023 • Source: Marley Mag • Res.: 1800px These are the only uncensored material I have access to (I won't pay 15 EUR). 2 - close-up portrait is a dupe but a non-IG source Nudity:

Ph.: Victoria Bashkirova • Date: posted May - June 2023 in Bali • Source: her IG • Res.: ~1800px

Ph.: Ekaterina Manoskina • Date: posted April - June 2023 in Bali • Source: her IG, Nastya's IG • Res.: ~1800px Like a lot of Russian photographer VK's, she doesn't post new stuff since 2022 Also: I take the time to order them but often imgbox screws up the order & sometimes like today I don't have the patience to sort them:

Additions to this shoot Ph.: Dmitry Kurasov • Date: shot Feb. 16 2023 • Source: his site • Res.: 1920px (+1 is 3840px) I only added those that are new OR dupes that have a substantially higher res'

CENSORSHIP bothers me, beyond words. I did not censor these pics, the photographer did (more on that in a bit). Every time I have access to nudity or previously censored pics, I post them here. In my post, you can see I state the source as being Instagram, which you can't upload nudes. That used to not be such a problem since a lot of these photographers posted the uncensored versions on other platforms like their VK, Flickr, 500px, etc. But in recent years, A LOT of photographers and "photographers" only use IG as their distribution platform because they (in reality or in their minds) get more views. I personally don't get it, especially since models cost more to shoot if it includes nudity, so if they're to end up censoring them, might as well pay to shoot slightly revealing shots to begin with. But yah, it's a plague.

Continuation of this post SELF-CENSORED Ph.: Lukas Dvorak • Date: posted May. 14 & 17 2023 • Source: his IG • Res.: 1800px

Ph.: Stanislav Pushkarev (aka Stas) • for: Agua • Date: shot ON or BEFORE Dec. 17 2022 • Source: their IG, their site, his IG • Res.: ~1280px BTS vids: 1 2 3

SELF-CENSORED Ph.: Lukas Dvorak • Date: posted Apr. 23 2023 • Source: his IG • Res.: 1799px The photographer describes he might upload them uncensored on his "blog" although I can only find his website which is a bit limited, granted I did not research too long either where his "blog" would be

UHQ Ph.: Jeny Photo • Date: posted Mar. 17 2023 [probably shot Feb. 2023] • Source: her site • Res.: 5532px There are way too many heavy files to upload them all (626 MB for 162 photos) which I SUBJECTIVELY find are not all worth it. But since maybe some tastes differ, I'll include contact sheets with file numbered names at the bottom for those I didn't upload & you can tell me if any you wish to have uploaded. Alternatively, you can download them from her site. 1st, 2 shots from the MUA dated Feb. 14 2023: Contact sheets for those excluded:

Ph.: Gerhard Merzeder • Date: posted April 10 2023 • Source: MUA's IG * • Res.: ~1440px * account was quickly deleted. Photographer's site (no apparent relevant uploads yet)

Ph.: Roman Erofeev • for: @birka_art • Date: posted April 17 2023 • Source: his IG, stylist's IG • Res.: 1800px