DaveKBaton

She might be more comfortable with something like Brandarmy that is strictly SFW or another similar platform.

yes. published October to November 2022.

It's called giving a source. That glasshouse must be drafty.

@jeffbogaers She's tagged in the post on IG.

Nothing is what happened. Career never really took off, both as a model and as an influencer. It happens a lot more than we will ever know I'm afraid. I have been following Rachel since the days when she was working alongside names like Carmella Rose or Abby Champion. Their careers took off or at least progressed, hers did not. She isn't alone and others have done worse. WIth her social-media metrics (overwhelmingly male), what she is currently doing is pretty much the best she can do now.

Tagged in the video are (besides Rachel, the magazine the shoot is for and the location): @jeffbogaers, Monica Sahara (@moni_saha), Tara Zoe Woltjes (@tarazoewoltjes), Indiania Hopkin? (@idaniahopkin), Luna Piombanti (@lunapiombanti) I am pretty sure that Monica Sahara is on the left and Idania Hopkin is on the right. Not sure which is which of the other two. jeffbogaers could be the woman in the middle but she should have a tattoo on the back of her arm above the elbow (it could be covered up though). But the hair seems too light for the other two models tagged. No idea who is in front of the mirror.

I didn't say that you were ... nonetheless how you perceive the events can be very different from her perception.

Hmm ... looking at synonyms for mocking: taunting maybe?

I agree that just DMing her and asking how much you would have to pay for a nude photoshoot is contraproductive and is certainly not going to make it more likely that she will do nudity. It is much more likely going to associate the idea of it with creeps in her mind and is going to make it more difficult for a photographer to convice her to do it (if the right photographer does approach her for that). And as far as I see it, she doesn't really produce content. She quite often usually does rather simply set up vids or pics and the more highly produced content of her is done by photographers that approached her rather than the reverse. Right now, I don't see her doing nudity by herself (lets be honest here - that's basically just porn or teasing, go take a cold shower, there is enough of that out there by women that aren't Emily) but at most with the right photographer (if at all). I don't think that she is entirely opposed to the idea yet ... right now she does appear to be amicable to covered nudity or at least something adjacent to it. I distinctly remember her undoing her bikini top in a recent video. Admittedly it was with her back to the camera but it does show that she is not strongly opposed to the implication of it. However unlike others I am not holding my breath for it. If it happens, it happens. If it does not happen, it doesn't happen. At the end of the day, it is nothing that we can't see elsewhere. She is very good looking IMO but she isn't uniquely good looking. As for another word for "actively opposing": Objecting or disapproving, perhaps? Or "crusading against"/"campaigning against"? It kinda depends on how strongly of an oppositiong you are trying to express.

UUHQ upgrades to the previously posted polaroids from Que Models:

Seems to me the most likely explanations. Looking at the other notes on the picture, they are all technical aspects about the shot. It would make no sense for her age to be noted in this regard but no other info about her. So this is possibly to the 23rd picture taken of Emily by that photographer in that session, so that you can refer to this specific picture. Or the year the picture was taken. It was a bit before my time but there used to be a bunch of family pictures marked like "Adam, 90" showing a teen. The 90 is clearly not in reference to the teen's age but the year the picture was taken. Alternative explanations could be in reference to the day of a longer shoot, or the day of the month, etc. ... Overall, it is almost certainly just a number to either identify the picture or a shorthand for a specific aspect of the picture. There is no indication that it is a reference to her age.

Looks like Abby has done something with Victoria's Secret ...

My personal conspiracy theory is that they're either getting paid to put the people they're putting in their Swimsuit issue or they otherwise profit from it (like they can write off the expense as a business expense and someone does them a favor somewhere or sometime else). At the end of the day it's all marketing, there is a product to be sold and those models are only a vehicle to market and sell the product. Which is why I think that the supermodels of old are going to go the way of the dinosaurs and that in the future supermodels will also have to be influencers to be truly successful.

Crazy idea. Get enough people together that committ to actually buy enough copies of the swimsuit edition if they were to put Carmella in it. Sad truth is that sexy has not been a big driving factor in print magazines for a very long time. As sad as it is ... the voices complaining about SI putting unattractive people in their Swimsuit edition are either A) the minority and not enough to offset the expense or B) weren't going to buy it anyway.

Hasn't that been shown for quite a while now? Her most commonly alleged age would have required her to repeat at least one grade maybe two to have been in the grade she was shown to be in. Available information did not add up. No surprise there IMO. There were pages of discussion here. IDK why we're retreading that again now that it has been confirmed that she is a legal adult now.